Document properties
Title, author, subject, keywords, creator application, producer, dates, and other supported entries from the PDF Info dictionary.
Local PDF document-property cleaner
Inspect a PDF, remove its document Info dictionary and catalog XMP from a newly rewritten copy, then re-scan the output before downloading it.
Choose one PDF to review its supported metadata first. Cleaning creates a new rewritten file, removes document properties and catalog XMP, then checks the result again.
Drop one PDF here
or choose a PDF from your device
PDF onlyOne file, up to 25 MB
4 source-traceable PDF fixtures · 18 cross-browser page checks
View test evidenceBatch PDF workspace
Remove the Info dictionary and catalog XMP from several PDFs, re-scan every output, and download one local archive.
Add batch documents
Up to 5 PDFs · 25 MB each · files stay on this device
What the PDF metadata remover changes
The cleaner removes both supported metadata references and asks qpdf to write a new PDF. It then checks the same locations again and refuses to claim success if metadata remains or the page count changes.
Title, author, subject, keywords, creator application, producer, dates, and other supported entries from the PDF Info dictionary.
Supported Dublin Core, Adobe PDF, XMP, rights, and location fields from the catalog Metadata stream.
The output is re-scanned for both supported metadata locations, with page count preservation and signature consequences reported explicitly.
Most PDF document properties are written automatically, not typed by you. Export tools, drivers, and editors fill in the Info dictionary and catalog XMP as a side effect of saving. Understanding which software wrote each field makes it easier to decide what a rewritten copy should leave behind.
When Word, Google Docs, or Pages exports a PDF, it usually copies the account display name into the Author field, records its own name and version in Creator and Producer, and stamps creation and modification dates. None of this appears on the page, so most people send the file without ever opening its document properties. If your account name differs from the name you sign with, that gap travels inside every export until a rewrite removes it.
A PDF does not have to come from an office suite to carry metadata. Scanner firmware, print-to-PDF drivers, LaTeX distributions, and virtual PDF printers each identify themselves in Producer or Creator, often down to the version number. That fingerprint can reveal which hardware or toolchain produced the document, which is more than many senders intend to share with a stranger.
A document that has been edited, merged, or converted several times can carry fields written at different stages. One tool sets Author, a later one updates Producer, and a merge may keep XMP from an earlier revision. The final export does not necessarily clear what earlier software wrote, so the properties you see last are not always the only ones in the file.
Document properties rarely matter inside your own team, but they change meaning the moment a PDF crosses an organizational boundary. These are the situations where people most often want to remove the author from a PDF or strip document properties before a copy goes out.
The Author field of a résumé often holds an account display name rather than the name printed at the top of the page, such as an old handle, a family member's laptop login, or the person who helped write it. Recruiters who open document properties can see that mismatch. Rewriting a copy without the Info dictionary and catalog XMP keeps the application to what you actually put on the page.
In a proposal or bid, Producer and date fields can tell a careful reader more than you planned: a template exported years ago and reused, a quote assembled at 2 a.m. the night before the deadline, or software registered to a different company name. Removing document properties from the outgoing copy keeps the negotiation focused on the offer instead of the file's production history.
Double-blind review depends on the manuscript not identifying its authors, yet the Author field frequently does exactly that, filled in by the word processor or LaTeX toolchain at export time. Reviewers and editors can open document properties in one click. Submitting a rewritten copy with the Info dictionary and XMP removed closes an avoidable channel that could undermine the anonymity the venue requires.
Anything published under an organization's name should carry the organization's story, not a staff member's login or the draft's revision timeline. Many communications teams already treat clearing document properties as one line on the release checklist, next to proofreading and link checks. A verified rewrite gives that step evidence: the new copy is re-scanned, and download is only offered after the supported fields are confirmed gone.
Exact capability boundary
This tool has a deliberately narrow, testable promise. It handles standard document properties and catalog XMP only. A security hardening workflow would need separate rules, previews, and evidence.
A visible local workflow
No cleaning starts until you can see what was detected and accept any digital-signature consequence.
Read supported document properties, XMP, page count, and signature markers before changing anything.
Remove the supported metadata references and use qpdf WebAssembly to create a new PDF.
Check the new PDF again and only enable download after metadata absence and page count are verified.
Do not take a cleaner's word for it, including this one. The rewritten copy is a new file you can check independently, and there are three easy ways to confirm what the rewrite actually removed.
Open the downloaded copy in Acrobat Reader or your browser's built-in viewer and look at the document properties dialog. Title, Author, Subject, Keywords, and the application entries should now be empty. Because this check uses ordinary software you already have, it is a quick first confirmation that the rewrite did what it reported.
exiftool file.pdfIf you want an independent second opinion, run exiftool file.pdf against the cleaned copy. ExifTool reads the same Info dictionary and XMP locations with a completely separate implementation, so agreement between its output and this tool's re-scan is meaningful evidence rather than a tool grading its own homework. It will still list structural entries such as page count and PDF version, which are not personal metadata.
The re-scan that gates the download button checks exactly two locations: the trailer Info dictionary and the catalog XMP stream, plus page count preservation. It is deliberately narrow so that a pass means something specific. It does not inspect annotations, attachments, or embedded files, so treat it as confirmation of scope, not a general audit.
PDF metadata questions
The important part is knowing what the tool can prove, what rewriting changes, and where a separate security workflow is still required.
Open PDF Metadata Viewer for a read-only look at document properties and catalog XMP.